[14:34:30]
<thushi> per chi stava aspettando l'intervista, ecco qua :)
Intervista a Omar Polo, developer di OpenBSD
http://m4vojazxsxvaxfoeklmq6na546fd5hjyo3zrgeq45cixdfm6kodkhdid.onion/blog/intervista-a-omar-polo-developer-di-openbsd.html
[15:56:24]
<Maranda> Non ho la cipolla sorry
[15:59:31]
<thushi> https://aria.im/_matrix/media/v1/download/fairydust.space/HctdiqhWWxOAKIRuyqloCfQZ
[15:59:41]
<thushi> tenga, buon uomo
[16:13:16]
<ice> interessante
[20:30:26]
<ice> ma openBSD e freeBSD sono fully free?
[20:30:29]
<ice> thushi:
[20:31:24]
<ice> "FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree firmware blobs."
[20:33:00]
<ice> "Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called “blobs,” and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance, the term “blob” means something else: a nonfree driver. OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called “projects” by BSD developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions “contain no blobs,” it causes a misunderstanding. They are not talking about firmware blobs.
None of those BSD distributions has policies against proprietary binary-only firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers."